Conflict is defined as a process of social interaction involving a struggle over claims to resources, power and status, preferences and desires.
People frequently use the terms dispute and conflict interchangeably but they are not synonymous. Conflict is a process; a dispute may be one of several products of conflict. . . . Whereas conflict is often ongoing, amorphous, and intangible, a dispute is tangible and concrete–it has issues, positions, and expectations for relief.”
“Conflict in an organization shows up in several ways:
1. Disputes . . .
2. Competition . . .
3. Sabotage . . .
4. Inefficiency/lack of productivity . . .
5. Low morale . . .
6. Withholding knowledge . . .
It is normally believed that conflict must be managed not only to increase the satisfaction of the team members, but also to achieve strategic project success. That, project team member satisfaction decreases substantially with higher intensity conflict at the organization level, and even more strongly at the project level.
Conflicts at organisational levels:
Conflicts in an organization can have two different kind of outcomes, based on how conflicts are managed:
A. Positive outcomes:
- May stimulate innovation and growth
- Improved decision making
- Alternative solutions to the problems may be found
- Enhanced individual or group performance
- Clarity of communication and position
B. Negative outcomes:
- May cause Job stress and dis-satisfaction
- Reduced communication
- Climate of distrust and suspicion may develop
- Relationships may be damaged
- Job performance may decrease
- Resistance to change may increase
The role of a mediator/manager would be to increase the positive outcomes and reduce the negative ones.
Classical view saw conflict as undesirable and detrimental for the organizations. They believed that for achieving organisational effectiveness, conflicts should be minimized by - rules and procedures, hierarchy, channel of command, which could increase harmony and cooperation. Thus taking the route of avoidance, suppression and compromise.
This view has seen a lot of change since Mid 20th Century. The view moved to organisations being capable of recognising the problems it faces and developing ways to solve these problems. Thus building in conflict resolution procedures into the organisations.
Lately the view has changed to explicit encouragement of opposition. Conflict management in such case is both stimulation and resolution of conflicts, which is a major responsibility of managers. Conflicts within certain limits when handled constructively is essential to the productivity.
Thus too little conflict many encourage stagnancy, mediocrity and too much conflict may lead to organisational disintegration.
Two conflict management styles—confronting and give and take—may have beneficial effects on success at the organization level. Confrontation—that is, true problem solving—is essential at the project level, even if a give-and-take style is better tolerated at the organization level. Smoothing, withdrawal, and forcing may all have negative effects.
Intra-Team OR Interpersonal Conflicts:
Task conflicts are disagreements amongst the team members on performance related activities, i.e. actual task or process of doing the task or delegating resources or duties. Task conflicts can be beneficial if managed collaboratively.
Non-task conflicts based on social events, gossip, clothing preferences, political views, hobbies, personality clashes and interpersonal antagonisms. These are mostly detrimental to team performance and morale.
Collaboration at work can help resolve task conflicts and collaboration outside the work settings, 'Off-line' can help manage the Non-task conflicts. Collaboration includes teamwork, developing trust, open task conflict communication norms.
Team ground rules, group norms and solid project management practices like communication planning and role definition can help reduce the amount of disruptive conflicts. Project team members should be initially responsible to resolve their own conflicts. "If you build it, they may or may not use it. On the other hand, if they build it, they will use it, refine it, tell others about it, and make it their own."
Some examples of Rules/Guidelines to help team members work through conflicts:
1. Conflict should be handled openly. "Give them two options: confront the conflict and handle it, or let it go,"
2. Conflicts should be addressed directly and as soon as they are seen breeding.
3. Build cohesion and trust. It's also easier to manage conflict when the team members know each other on a personal level. Ask each one to give a three-minute personal and professional update at the beginning of meetings.
4. Stick to the facts
5. Lead by example. Practice full disclosure. In an argument or discussion, team members should reveal all of their arguments and make it clear why they have taken a particular position.
If it escalates, manager should help facilitate resolving the conflict. Such conflict should be handled early, in private using a direct and collaborative approach. Manager should also keep a lookout for unresolved issues which may lead to conflicts amongst the team members.
How to handle interpersonal conflicts can also be documented guidelines at the organisational level or dependent on the situation one or a mix of the below mentioned style can be adopted:
Level 1: Preventive
- Partnering or collaboration (includes Teamwork, developing trust)
- Consensus building
- Joint problem solving
- Negotiating
Level 2: Advisory
Level 3: Facilitated
Level 4: Fact-Finding
- Neutral expert fact finding
Level 5: Nonbinding arbitration
Level 6: Imposed
Further Reading:
Managing Conflict in Organisations - 3rd Edition - M Afzalur Rahim
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge PMBOK - 3rd Edition
The Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior - Edwin A. Locke